I'm fine with there being differences. In fact, I tend to prefer worlds that are very very different from history. Which is why I mentioned that the closer to history it is, the more things like lacking a Jewish analogue bug me. For example, in one fantasy series, there's a fully fledged Rome analogue, a Byzantine analogue, a medieval Catholic Church analogue, mystical heresies, and a Middle East. They're even probably on the cusp of a Reformation. Still no Jews. The closer to real history you get, the more jarring the absence of oppressed people, especially ones who played a big part in that history. Then of course you get to the whole sets of history we happily ignore.
There are sometimes I like a world with no constancy, for example, Alice in Wonderland and The Phantom Tollbooth (yeah, I like shiny shiny kitchen sink novels) but I just get annoyed when authors happily copy bits and pieces from other novels and from history and cobble them together with no consideration for whether or not the whole works.
no subject
There are sometimes I like a world with no constancy, for example, Alice in Wonderland and The Phantom Tollbooth (yeah, I like shiny shiny kitchen sink novels) but I just get annoyed when authors happily copy bits and pieces from other novels and from history and cobble them together with no consideration for whether or not the whole works.