Dragoncake

[attackfish]

I usually only buy books that I have read until their spines fell off at the local library so that I may cheerfully do the same thing to my own copy.  Otherwise, I buy books by authors I particularly like, or that a friend lent to me and then inconveniently moved away.  I do not buy books based on their cover art.  Recently it seems that fantasy books have gotten a cover art overhaul, but the old covers of the genre are sometimes outright appalling.

Fish: They’re like romance covers without the beefcake and cheesecake.
Mom: Dragoncake!
Fish: You misunderstand, there is no pinup value.
Mom: I had a Tolkien calendar when I was your age, I pinned that up.
Fish: I think that you should tell Dad about your odd-
Mom: Castlecake!

Truly, cover art is no reflection of the quality of a book, and it happens to the best authors.  There are some books I walked around with unblushingly in my relatively innocent youth and yet now dread to leave my house with.  At times I am relieved when I have read the covers off, so that I can take them out of my house without cringing.  Does anyone else out there have terrible covers to decent books?

 

  

 

Comments

[ivanoma.livejournal.com]

don't own the books to show you the covers and too lazy to look them up, but Stasheff's Wizard in Rhyme series has some decent covers.

[attackfish.livejournal.com]

not half bad, but definitely nineties. the really awful stuff was in the eighties and seventies