Re: Hey

Date: 2008-06-18 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Star Wars is something of a unique case in that certain aspects of the Expanded Universe Books are considered cannon by LucasFilm and other aspects aren't. It's safe to say that any official work is cannon (movies, TV Series, Etc) but when you get into any of the EU works it gets a little thorny because there really is no way to tell one way or the other.

Star Trek is a little more firm. Only official works released by Paramount are cannon unless specifically stated otherwise. None of the books are unless they are an adapted screenplay of a released work. (novels based on movies for instance) The Animated Series for example is considered non cannon and Star Trek V though it hasn't had it's cannon status revoked is largely ignored. Now parts of the Animated Series have been made canon by being referenced in a different official series but only the parts being specifically referenced are then considered Cannon.

In the end I feel the debate over Cannon vs Non Cannon is pointless. The fact is it's a fictional universe and we each take away what we will while discarding the rest. Some of us consider certain exceptional fan works as our own cannon, or fannon if you will. Until something comes along that specifically contradicts it or confirms it I'm content to have it my own little universe.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

attackfish: Yshre girl wearing a kippah, text "Attackfish" (Default)
attackfish

July 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 2930
31      

Avatar: the Last Airbender

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 13th, 2026 12:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios